The section 49 regime provides for a derogation from the above rule, providing that an unregistered document, which relates to the property and which must otherwise be registered either by the registration law or by the TPA, can be obtained as proof of a contract in an appeal for a specified benefit or as evidence of an incidental transaction. The Supreme Court in KB Saha-Sons (P) Ltd/Development Consultant Ltd [(2008) 8 CSC 564] found that a mandatory document, if not registered, can only be considered in a court action for a given benefit as evidence of a contract performed between two parties and that this unregord document cannot be considered as proof of the content of the contract. Therefore, if a document is inadmissible as proof of non-registration, none of its provisions can be admitted as evidence. 2) He must come to the town hall to terminate the contract. What the sales contract creates is the buyer`s right to acquire the property in question in 1996, 1996. Similarly, the seller obtains the right to obtain the buyer`s consideration in accordance with his part of the terms and conditions. The sales contract is valid for three years. If the contract contains a negative clause, the buyer must register the property within three months. (ii) subject to the same stamp duty as the obligation to transport the laws on stamps, contracts of sale with default and/or irrevocable powers in favour of non-members who authorize the sale.
4) Is there a clause that the balance will only be paid when you satisfy the buyer of the property? (i) the amendment of the Registration Act, 1908 by Amendment Act 48 of 2001 with effect to 24.9.2001, which requires documents that have transferred a contract for a fee (sales agreements, etc.) relating to real estate within the meaning of Section 53A of the Act must be registered; and ownership can be transferred by different modes, for example. B, through sale, mortgage, leasing, gift, exchange, etc. Under the Property Transfer Act 1882, Section 54 states that the sale is defined as the transfer of ownership of a property for a price paid or promised or partially promised or partially promised or partially promised. Continued observation by Delhi High Court at Asha M. Jain v. Canara Bank – 94 (2001) DLT 841, that the „sales proxy concept have been recognized as a type of transaction“ when transactions with transactions using SA/GPA/WILL are unjustified and unjustified and unjustified, unintentionally misleading the public to believe that SA/GPA/WILL transactions are some kind of recognized or accepted transfer type and that it may be a valid substitute for a sale. These decisions, to the extent that they recognize or accept SA/GPA/WILL transactions as completed assignments, unlike a transfer agreement, are not a right. The sale contract may or may not lead to an effective sale of the property in question. Some stamp tax laws, such as the Maharashtra Stamp Act, consider that an agreement to sell a property on the same basis as a proper transport record, as well as a proper transport record, are subject to the same stamp duty as the one in force for the proper sale of a property.